MantisBT - DriverPacks BASE |
View Issue Details |
|
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
0000356 | DriverPacks BASE | slipstreamer | public | 2007-03-24 07:09 | 2008-05-09 02:24 |
|
Reporter | Vier57 | |
Assigned To | OverFlow | |
Priority | normal | Severity | block | Reproducibility | always |
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | |
Platform | | OS | | OS Version | |
Product Version | 7.03rc2 | |
Target Version | | Fixed in Version | | |
Destination OS Platform | wnt5_x86-32 (Windows XP) |
Installation Platform | disc (CD/DVD) |
DriverPacks | MassStorage |
DriverPacks Method | not applicable |
DriverPacks Finisher Method | not applicable |
|
Summary | 0000356: No detect RAID system in IC5R |
Description | I'm testing last version of MassStorage, and I have found a previus bug [url]http://bugtracker.driverpacks.net/view.php?id=6[/url] [^] appear in new system.
After many test with last system and compare with previous system (working), I have found a solution for make working :
- Sort differently SCSI and SCSI.Load section :
In last system :
The new lines are in end of section in descending order
In working system :
The new line are in begin of system in ascending order
In attached file are good TXTsetup file.
PS : if you want help for code, no problem !
|
Steps To Reproduce | |
Additional Information | |
Tags | No tags attached. |
Relationships | |
Attached Files | TXTSETUP.SIF (511,018) 2007-03-24 07:09 http://bugtracker.driverpacks.net/file_download.php?file_id=247&type=bug |
|
Issue History |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2007-03-24 07:09 | Vier57 | New Issue | |
2007-03-24 07:09 | Vier57 | Status | new => assigned |
2007-03-24 07:09 | Vier57 | Assigned To | => BashratTheSneaky |
2007-03-24 07:09 | Vier57 | File Added: TXTSETUP.SIF | |
2007-03-24 07:09 | Vier57 | Destination OS Platform | => wnt5_x86-32 (Windows XP) |
2007-03-24 07:09 | Vier57 | Installation Platform | => disc (CD/DVD) |
2007-03-24 07:09 | Vier57 | DriverPacks | => MassStorage |
2007-03-24 07:09 | Vier57 | DriverPacks Method | => not applicable |
2007-03-24 07:09 | Vier57 | DriverPacks Finisher Method | => not applicable |
2007-03-24 11:25 | BashratTheSneaky | Note Added: 0000644 | |
2007-03-25 06:49 | Vier57 | Note Added: 0000646 | |
2007-04-04 10:57 | Vier57 | Note Added: 0000649 | |
2007-04-04 11:11 | Vier57 | Note Added: 0000650 | |
2008-05-04 19:23 | OverFlow | Assigned To | BashratTheSneaky => OverFlow |
2008-05-04 19:23 | OverFlow | Note Added: 0000744 | |
2008-05-04 19:23 | OverFlow | Status | assigned => feedback |
2008-05-09 02:24 | OverFlow | Status | feedback => closed |
2008-05-09 02:24 | OverFlow | Resolution | open => fixed |
Notes |
|
|
This is not enough information. Plus, sorting the drivers in a certain order is NOT a good work-around, and in theory should not make a difference.
Could you please mention WHICH driver is problematic? |
|
|
(0000646)
|
Vier57
|
2007-03-25 06:49
|
|
I'm using the system without change in TXTSETUP.sif file. My hardware (ICH5R) is not recognize : iastor.sys file
But If I change the order of line in SCSI section and SCSI.load section, my RAID0 HDD is recognize.
I don't know why, in first case it's not recognize (I know in theory it's no change), but if I change the order of line it's works. I think that is due too at the order of charging driver ? Perhaps this new order solve other problem with other MassStorage ? |
|
|
(0000649)
|
Vier57
|
2007-04-04 10:57
|
|
After test demand by Muiz3 : I suppress many driver in ini file.
And I make different test : for the moment If I suppress all Adaptec driver, my raid system is detect !
I search what is driver block my detection ! |
|
|
(0000650)
|
Vier57
|
2007-04-04 11:11
|
|
After many test : I found the problem :
- AD-A : if I desactivate it, no problem
I think is normal, perhaps an error in HWID :
- "PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_24DF,PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_24DF&SUBSYS_498015D9&REV_02,PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_25B0"
And In my IastorOld :
- "PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_24DF&CC_0104,PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_25B0&CC_0104"
If you see first line : "PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_24DF" and mine !? |
|
|
|
I belive this is now fixed in 8.05 |
|